Internet Archaeology

570 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 570 papers published in Internet Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Internet Archaeology usually cover Archeology (221 papers), Space and Planetary Science (153 papers) and Paleontology (118 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (153 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (116 papers) and Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internet Archaeology are Nicolas Ray, Jonathan M. Adams, J. Andrés Christen, Caitlin E. Buck, Julian D. Richards, David Wheatley, Penelope M. Allison, Melissa Terras, Jeremy Huggett and Robert Witcher.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Internet Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internet Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internet Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Internet Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internet Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internet Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internet Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025