Critical Review

822 papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 822 papers published in Critical Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (354 papers), Sociology and Political Science (297 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (229 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (160 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (160 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Review are Philip E. Converse, Jeffrey Friedman, Ilya Somin, Bernard Yack, Matthew Richardson, Viral V. Acharya, Peter J. Boettke, Joseph E. Uscinski, Arthur Lupia and James Druckman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Review.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025