International Ophthalmology

5.0k papers and 47.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.0k papers published in International Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 47.1k indexed citations. Papers published in International Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (3.7k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.4k papers) and Epidemiology (754 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1.7k papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1.2k papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Ophthalmology are Robert B. Nussenblatt, Carl P. Herbort, Gholam A. Peyman, John M. Tiffany, Narsing A. Rao, İlknur Tuğal-Tutkun, Ahmed M. Abu El‐Asrar, Enrique Malbran, Sohan Singh Hayreh and Gary C. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in International Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025