International Game Theory Review

618 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 618 papers published in International Game Theory Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in International Game Theory Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (435 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (384 papers) and Safety Research (72 papers) specifically the topics of Game Theory and Applications (319 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (244 papers) and Economic theories and models (191 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Game Theory Review are Théodore C. Bergstrom, Krzysztof R. Apt, Andreas Witzel, Georges Zaccour, Sjur Didrik Flåm, Marko Lindroos, Maurizio Falcone, Kjell Hausken, Steffen Jørgensen and Jan Tuinstra.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Game Theory Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Game Theory Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Game Theory Review.

Countries where authors publish in International Game Theory Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Game Theory Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Game Theory Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Game Theory Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025