Internal and Emergency Medicine

2.3k papers and 28.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 28.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (622 papers), Surgery (543 papers) and Epidemiology (507 papers) specifically the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (194 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (182 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internal and Emergency Medicine are Benjamin Rouse, Anna Chaimani, Tianjing Li, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Gian Franco Gensini, Francesco Violi, Ida Martinelli, Angelo Gatta, Marcel Levi and Massimo Bolognesi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Internal and Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internal and Emergency Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internal and Emergency Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internal and Emergency Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025