International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

26.0k citations
2.4k papers · · active since 2008

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

1.7k papers receiving 21.6k citations

Peers

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Management Science and Operations Research 6.2k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 787
  • Artificial Intelligence 3.0k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.0k
  • Information Systems 1.2k
Replace Kybernetes with:
Kybernetes China
Complex & Intelligent Systems China
Expert Systems India
Journal of Computational Science United States
Alexandria Engineering Journal China
Complexity China
Algorithms China
International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems China
Journal of Quality Technology United States
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics China
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems relative to Kybernetes China Kybernetes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kybernetes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems.

About International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

The 2.4k papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems in the last decades have received a total of 26.0k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems usually cover Management Science and Operations Research (366 papers), Artificial Intelligence (400 papers), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (64 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (169 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (108 papers) specifically the topics of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (259 papers), Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (137 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (50 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (44 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (41 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (40 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (37 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems are Cengiz Kahraman, Luis M. Martínez, Sezi Çevik Onar, Başar Öztayşi, Francisco Herrera, Peide Liu, Tianrui Li, Biswajeet Pradhan, Huaxiong Li and Xianzhong Zhou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact