Countries where authors publish in Human Gene Therapy Methods
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Gene Therapy Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Gene Therapy Methods more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods
This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods.
About Human Gene Therapy Methods
The 254 papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Human Gene Therapy Methods usually cover Genetics (193 papers), Molecular Biology (197 papers) and Infectious Diseases (33 papers) specifically the topics of Virus-based gene therapy research (190 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (87 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (73 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (72 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (47 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (29 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (19 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Gene Therapy Methods are Thomas Weber, James M. Wilson, Roger J. Hajjar, Martin Lock, Mauricio R. Alvira, Shu‐Jen Chen, Elizabeth A. Stoll, Carolina Gándara, Kyle Chamberlain and Jalish M. Riyad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.