Health Services Insights

345 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 345 papers published in Health Services Insights in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Services Insights usually cover General Health Professions (165 papers), Economics and Econometrics (72 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (57 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (46 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (46 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Services Insights are Sheree Smith, Redwanur Rahman, Farooq Naeem, Muhammad Irfan, Lina Gega, Narsimha R. Pinninti, Shanaya Rathod, Paul Gorczynski, Charlene Harrington and Kerstin Pahl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Services Insights

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Services Insights. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Services Insights.

Countries where authors publish in Health Services Insights

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Services Insights. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Services Insights with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Services Insights more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025