Countries where authors publish in Health Psychology Open
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Psychology Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Psychology Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Psychology Open more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Health Psychology Open
This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Psychology Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Psychology Open.
About Health Psychology Open
The 324 papers published in Health Psychology Open in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Health Psychology Open usually cover Applied Psychology (47 papers), Clinical Psychology (124 papers), Health (39 papers), Pharmacy (22 papers) and Social Psychology (78 papers) specifically the topics of Eating Disorders and Behaviors (40 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (31 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (29 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (25 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (21 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (21 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Psychology Open are Seong Soo, Dalia Bedewy, Adel Gabriel, David F Marks, Alexandra D. Crosswell, Kimberly G. Lockwood, Carol D. Ryff, Fuschia M. Sirois, Kristin J. Homan and Ray Marks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.