Health Psychology Open

316 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 316 papers published in Health Psychology Open in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Psychology Open usually cover Clinical Psychology (119 papers), General Health Professions (87 papers) and Social Psychology (77 papers) specifically the topics of Eating Disorders and Behaviors (38 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (31 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Psychology Open are Seong Soo, David F Marks, Dalia Bedewy, Adel Gabriel, Kimberly G. Lockwood, Alexandra D. Crosswell, Carol D. Ryff, Ray Marks, Fuschia M. Sirois and Kristin J. Homan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Psychology Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Psychology Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Psychology Open.

Countries where authors publish in Health Psychology Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Psychology Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Psychology Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Psychology Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025