Helvetica physica acta

290 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 290 papers published in Helvetica physica acta in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Helvetica physica acta usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (87 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (49 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (40 papers) specifically the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (22 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (18 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Helvetica physica acta are U. Niederer, B. I. Halperin, A. Petermann, Nicolas Gisin, K. Hepp, Markus Fierz, Res Jost, P. Stampfli, A. Krause and E. C. G. Stueckelberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Helvetica physica acta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Helvetica physica acta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Helvetica physica acta.

Countries where authors publish in Helvetica physica acta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Helvetica physica acta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Helvetica physica acta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helvetica physica acta more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025