Horizons in Biblical Theology

275 papers and 419 indexed citations i.

About

The 275 papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology in the last decades have received a total of 419 indexed citations. Papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology usually cover Religious studies (229 papers), Sociology and Political Science (100 papers) and Archeology (48 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (223 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (46 papers) and Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Horizons in Biblical Theology are J. Andrew Dearman, Walter Brueggemann, J. J. M. Roberts, Stephen L. Cook, Mark Allan Powell, Terence E. Fretheim, Stanley J. Grenz, Lloyd Gaston, Garrett Green and Simon Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology.

Countries where authors publish in Horizons in Biblical Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Horizons in Biblical Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Horizons in Biblical Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Horizons in Biblical Theology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025