Historiographia Linguistica

737 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 737 papers published in Historiographia Linguistica in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Historiographia Linguistica usually cover Language and Linguistics (588 papers), Linguistics and Language (119 papers) and Philosophy (117 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (514 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (131 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (121 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historiographia Linguistica are John E. Joseph, Stephen O. Murray, Marcin Kilarski, John Laver, Joseph L. Subbiondo, Régna Darnell, R. E. Asher, E.F.K. Koerner, Robert A. Hall and G. L. Bursill-Hall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Historiographia Linguistica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historiographia Linguistica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historiographia Linguistica.

Countries where authors publish in Historiographia Linguistica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historiographia Linguistica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historiographia Linguistica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historiographia Linguistica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025