Countries where authors publish in Hip International
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hip International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hip International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hip International more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Hip International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hip International.
About Hip International
The 2.3k papers published in Hip International in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Hip International usually cover Surgery (2.2k papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (195 papers), Internal Medicine (49 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (155 papers) and Rheumatology (97 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1.9k papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (1.3k papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (1.1k papers), Hip disorders and treatments (895 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (328 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (167 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (138 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hip International are Reinhold Ganz, Michael Leunig, Richard N. Villar, Derek J. W. McMinn, Henk Eijer, David Beverland, Tim Board, Ian D. Learmonth, Michael Wyatt and Reinhard Graf.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.