Congress & the Presidency

438 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 438 papers published in Congress & the Presidency in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Congress & the Presidency usually cover Political Science and International Relations (356 papers), Strategy and Management (108 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (87 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (273 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (104 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Congress & the Presidency are Brian Frederick, Gary C. Jacobson, Joel D. Aberbach, George C. Edwards, Gisela Sin, Matthew Eshbaugh‐Soha, Richard Powell, David W. Rohde, Mark P. Petracca and Timothy R. Johnson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Congress & the Presidency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Congress & the Presidency. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Congress & the Presidency.

Countries where authors publish in Congress & the Presidency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Congress & the Presidency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Congress & the Presidency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Congress & the Presidency more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025