History of economic ideas

220 papers and 620 indexed citations i.

About

The 220 papers published in History of economic ideas in the last decades have received a total of 620 indexed citations. Papers published in History of economic ideas usually cover Economics and Econometrics (137 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (75 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (62 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Institutions (102 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (73 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of economic ideas are Flaminio Squazzoni, Michael Emmett Brady, John B. Davis, W. Brian Arthur, Magda Fontana, Cristiano Antonelli, Daniele Besomi, Harald Hagemann, David M. Levy and Robert W. Dimand.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of economic ideas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of economic ideas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of economic ideas.

Countries where authors publish in History of economic ideas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of economic ideas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of economic ideas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of economic ideas more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025