Gynaecological Endoscopy

402 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 402 papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (238 papers), Reproductive Medicine (177 papers) and Surgery (155 papers) specifically the topics of Uterine Myomas and Treatments (187 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (143 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gynaecological Endoscopy are Ray Garry, John Dewhurst, C. R. Whitfield, Harrith M. Hasson, Chris Sutton, David E. Parkin, Harry Reich, Olav Istre, Robert E. Richardson and Maurice E. Arregui.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy.

Countries where authors publish in Gynaecological Endoscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gynaecological Endoscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gynaecological Endoscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gynaecological Endoscopy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025