Countries where authors publish in Growth and Change
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Growth and Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Growth and Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Growth and Change more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Growth and Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Growth and Change.
About Growth and Change
The 1.7k papers published in Growth and Change in the last decades have received a total of 27.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Growth and Change usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Urban Studies (161 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (182 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (517 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (259 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (200 papers), Housing Market and Economics (192 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (154 papers), Global trade and economics (116 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (114 papers) and Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Growth and Change are Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Max Lu, Timothy J. Bartik, Mark D. Partridge, Richard Shearmur, Alan MacPherson, Roberta Capello, Anders Malmberg, Peter Maskell and Henry Wai‐chung Yeung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.