Growth and Change

1.7k papers and 24.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Growth and Change in the last decades have received a total of 24.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Growth and Change usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (378 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (262 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (514 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (250 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Growth and Change are Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Max Lu, Timothy J. Bartik, Mark D. Partridge, Richard Shearmur, Peter Maskell, Anders Malmberg, Alan MacPherson, Roberta Capello and Henry Wai‐chung Yeung.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Growth and Change

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Growth and Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Growth and Change.

Countries where authors publish in Growth and Change

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Growth and Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Growth and Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Growth and Change more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025