Countries where authors publish in Granular Matter
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Granular Matter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Granular Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Granular Matter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Granular Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Granular Matter.
About Granular Matter
The 1.6k papers published in Granular Matter in the last decades have received a total of 35.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Granular Matter usually cover Computational Mechanics (1.0k papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (535 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (667 papers) specifically the topics of Granular flow and fluidized beds (987 papers), Landslides and related hazards (535 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (412 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (205 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (164 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (147 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (137 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Granular Matter are G. R. McDowell, Stefan Luding, J. Tejchman, J. Schwedes, Guilhem Mollon, Mingjing Jiang, Katalin Bagi, Hans J. Herrmann, Algis Džiugys and Jin Y. Ooi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.