Michael Maniates

1.5k total citations
12 papers, 769 citations indexed

About

Michael Maniates is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Maniates has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 769 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Michael Maniates's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). Michael Maniates is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). Michael Maniates collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Michael Maniates's co-authors include Doris Fuchs, Sylvia Lorek, Antonietta Di Giulio, Thomas Princen, Inge Røpke, Katharina Glaab, Antonia Graf and Marlyne Sahakian and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Energy Policy and BioScience.

In The Last Decade

Michael Maniates

12 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Maniates United States 7 277 235 125 122 81 12 769
Cindy Isenhour United States 17 168 0.6× 194 0.8× 165 1.3× 153 1.3× 162 2.0× 43 821
Antonietta Di Giulio Switzerland 18 224 0.8× 234 1.0× 176 1.4× 162 1.3× 70 0.9× 49 939
Emily Huddart Kennedy Canada 16 345 1.2× 388 1.7× 74 0.6× 186 1.5× 44 0.5× 26 878
Susan Paulson United States 12 294 1.1× 129 0.5× 199 1.6× 44 0.4× 75 0.9× 38 875
Daniel Welch United Kingdom 13 187 0.7× 135 0.6× 88 0.7× 219 1.8× 162 2.0× 29 876
Basil Bornemann Switzerland 13 234 0.8× 171 0.7× 354 2.8× 54 0.4× 89 1.1× 49 912
Margit Keller Estonia 14 165 0.6× 63 0.3× 73 0.6× 150 1.2× 51 0.6× 29 536
Edwin Zaccaï Belgium 10 244 0.9× 225 1.0× 164 1.3× 81 0.7× 75 0.9× 64 780
Serge Latouche France 14 341 1.2× 181 0.8× 109 0.9× 50 0.4× 57 0.7× 82 854
Luke Yates United Kingdom 11 381 1.4× 63 0.3× 67 0.5× 110 0.9× 52 0.6× 16 890

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Maniates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Maniates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Maniates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Maniates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Maniates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Maniates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Maniates. The network helps show where Michael Maniates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Maniates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Maniates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Maniates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Maniates. Michael Maniates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Fuchs, Doris, Marlyne Sahakian, Antonietta Di Giulio, et al.. (2021). Consumption Corridors. 87 indexed citations
2.
Fuchs, Doris, Marlyne Sahakian, Antonietta Di Giulio, et al.. (2021). Consumption Corridors. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva). 47 indexed citations
3.
Fuchs, Doris, Antonietta Di Giulio, Katharina Glaab, et al.. (2015). Power: the missing element in sustainable consumption and absolute reductions research and action. Journal of Cleaner Production. 132. 298–307. 143 indexed citations
4.
Maniates, Michael & Thomas Princen. (2015). Fifteen claims: social change and power in environmental studies. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 5(2). 213–217. 5 indexed citations
5.
Maniates, Michael. (2014). Sustainable Consumption – Three Paradoxes. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. 23(3). 201–208. 7 indexed citations
6.
Maniates, Michael. (2012). Everyday Possibilities. Global Environmental Politics. 12(1). 121–125. 5 indexed citations
7.
Maniates, Michael. (2003). Turning numbers into knowledge: mastering the art of problem solving. Energy Policy. 31(12). 1301–1303. 4 indexed citations
8.
Maniates, Michael. (2002). Encountering Global Environmental Politics: Teaching, Learning, and Empowering Knowledge. 8 indexed citations
9.
Maniates, Michael. (2001). Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?. Global Environmental Politics. 1(3). 31–52. 425 indexed citations
10.
Maniates, Michael, et al.. (2000). Environmental Studies: The Sky Is Not Falling. BioScience. 50(6). 509–509. 30 indexed citations
11.
Maniates, Michael. (1993). Geography and Environmental Literacy: Let's Look Before We Leap∗. The Professional Geographer. 45(3). 351–354. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026