Global Journal Al-Thaqafah

280 papers and 783 indexed citations

About

The 280 papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah in the last decades have received a total of 783 indexed citations. Papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah usually cover Accounting (148 papers), Sociology and Political Science (145 papers) and Education (138 papers) specifically the topics of Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (143 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (117 papers) and Islamic Finance and Communication (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah are Suhana Mohezar, Maimun Aqsha Lubis, Suhaiza Zailani, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi, Faizah Darus, Md. Mahmudul Alam, Ab. Halim Tamuri, Jamaliah Said, Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor and Zurina Mohaidin.

In The Last Decade

Global Journal Al-Thaqafah

170 papers receiving 691 citations

Fields of papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah.

Countries where authors publish in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Journal Al-Thaqafah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Journal Al-Thaqafah more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026