Geothermal Energy

335 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Geothermal Energy in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Geothermal Energy usually cover Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (149 papers), Environmental Engineering (132 papers) and Geophysics (118 papers) specifically the topics of Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications (146 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (92 papers) and Groundwater flow and contamination studies (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geothermal Energy are Gioia Falcone, Xiaolei Liu, K. Breede, Thomas Köhl, Michael J. Heap, Jean Schmittbuhl, Philipp Blum, Ernst Huenges, Albert Genter and Yu Wu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geothermal Energy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geothermal Energy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geothermal Energy.

Countries where authors publish in Geothermal Energy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geothermal Energy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geothermal Energy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geothermal Energy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025