Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing

268 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 268 papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (170 papers), Surgery (53 papers) and Emergency Medicine (38 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (75 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (48 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing are Najib Ayas, Gonzalo G. Alvarez, Kathleen Dracup, David M. Levine, Lee Bone, Michael D. Hill, Miyong T. Kim, Karen Hancock, Esther Chang and John Daly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025