Geoscientific model development

163.1k citations
3.8k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
    • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
    • Cryospheric studies and observations
    • Climate variability and models
    • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
    • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds

Papers in

    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 1.0k
    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 851
    • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate 453
    • Cryospheric studies and observations 392
    • Climate variability and models 1.2k
    • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 854
    • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds 397

Geoscientific model development

3.6k papers receiving 160.7k citations

Peers

Geoscientific model development
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Atmospheric Science 93.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 98.0k
  • Oceanography 19.5k
  • Environmental Engineering 19.9k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 15.1k
Replace Theoretical and Applied Climatology with:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology China
Natural Hazards China
Environmental Research Letters United States
Climatic Change United States
Tellus B United States
Atmospheric Research China
Global and Planetary Change China
AMBIO Sweden
Eos United States
Environmental Modelling & Software United States
Geoscientific model development relative to Theoretical and Applied Climatology China Theoretical and Applied Climatology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Theoretical and Applied Climatology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Geoscientific model development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geoscientific model development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geoscientific model development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoscientific model development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Geoscientific model development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geoscientific model development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geoscientific model development.

About Geoscientific model development

The 3.8k papers published in Geoscientific model development in the last decades have received a total of 163.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Geoscientific model development usually cover Atmospheric Science (2.5k papers), Global and Planetary Change (2.4k papers), Oceanography (557 papers), Environmental Engineering (522 papers) and Water Science and Technology (283 papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (1.2k papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (1.0k papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (854 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (851 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (453 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (397 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (392 papers) and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (350 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geoscientific model development are Tianfeng Chai, Roland R. Draxler, Veronika Eyring, Gerald A. Meehl, Bjorn Stevens, Catherine A. Senior, Karl E. Taylor, Sandrine Bony, Ronald J. Stouffer and Timothy Hodson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact