Geological Quarterly

2.1k papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Geological Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Geological Quarterly usually cover Geophysics (1.5k papers), Law (822 papers) and Paleontology (437 papers) specifically the topics of Geological Formations and Processes Exploration (1.4k papers), Geology and Environmental Impact Studies (822 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (379 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geological Quarterly are Ryszard Dadlez, Nestor Oszczypko, Piotr Krzywiec, Marek Narkiewicz, Martin G. Lockley, Jerzy Nawrocki, Tadeusz Marek Peryt, Paweł Poprawa, Ryszard Kryza and Michał Szulczewski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geological Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geological Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Geological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geological Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geological Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geological Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025