Przegląd Geologiczny

2.7k papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny usually cover Law (1.7k papers), Geophysics (1.6k papers) and Water Science and Technology (751 papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Environmental Impact Studies (1.7k papers), Geological Formations and Processes Exploration (1.6k papers) and Integrated Water Resources Management (740 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Przegląd Geologiczny are Nestor Oszczypko, Tadeusz Marek Peryt, Leszek Marks, Stefan Kozłowski, Izabela Bojakowska, Paweł Henryk Karnkowski, Leszek Lindner, Paweł Poprawa, Grzegorz Czapowski and Piotr Krzywiec.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny.

Countries where authors publish in Przegląd Geologiczny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Przegląd Geologiczny. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Przegląd Geologiczny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Przegląd Geologiczny more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025