Geologica Carpathica

565 papers and 6.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 565 papers published in Geologica Carpathica in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Geologica Carpathica usually cover Geophysics (443 papers), Paleontology (233 papers) and Atmospheric Science (153 papers) specifically the topics of Geological Formations and Processes Exploration (343 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (210 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (186 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geologica Carpathica are Peter Vršanský, Michal Kováč, Ján Soták, Michael Wagreich, Stjepan Ćorić, Mathias Harzhauser, Nestor Oszczypko, Argyrios Kapsiotis, Rastislav Vojtko and Daniela Reháková.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geologica Carpathica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geologica Carpathica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geologica Carpathica.

Countries where authors publish in Geologica Carpathica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geologica Carpathica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geologica Carpathica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geologica Carpathica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025