Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite

1.2k papers and 20.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite in the last decades have received a total of 20.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite usually cover Molecular Biology (388 papers), Surgery (108 papers) and Immunology (104 papers) specifically the topics of Endometriosis Research and Treatment (28 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (26 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite are Michel Goldberg, Brandon S. Cooper, Q. Ping Dou, Singh Rajender, Lena Lavie, Rajesh K. Naz, Tahira Farooqui, Irene Piaceri, M. Guillaume Wientjes and Boris Kingma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025