Frontiers in Biology

398 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Frontiers in Biology in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (216 papers), Plant Science (56 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (37 papers) specifically the topics of Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (22 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (20 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Biology are Afsar U. Ahmed, Paul A. Nakata, Ahlke Heydemann, Jia Luo, Jong‐In Park, John Carvalho, Katrina M. Ramonell, Wenhui Hu, Nazia Jamil and Yonggang Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025