Frontiers in Veterinary Science

8.7k papers and 78.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.7k papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science in the last decades have received a total of 78.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science usually cover Small Animals (1.8k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (1.7k papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (994 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (733 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (716 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Veterinary Science are Steven C. Ricke, Rajesh Jha, Youssef A. Attia, Brian B. Oakley, Woo Kyun Kim, Mohamed A. A. Mahdy, Jan S. Suchodolski, Rachel Pilla, Birendra Mishra and Michael H. Kogut.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Veterinary Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025