Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

1.5k papers and 39.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy in the last decades have received a total of 39.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (659 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (461 papers) and Molecular Biology (363 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (376 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (224 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy are Javier DeFelipe, Javier Blesa, Suzana Herculano‐Houzel, Yuri Gonchar, Dirk Feldmeyer, Luis Puelles, Igor Jakovčevski, Serge Przedborski, Inés Trigo‐Damas and Ana Quiroga‐Varela.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Neuroanatomy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025