Flow Turbulence and Combustion

1.8k papers and 37.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion in the last decades have received a total of 37.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion usually cover Computational Mechanics (1.6k papers), Aerospace Engineering (600 papers) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (519 papers) specifically the topics of Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (840 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (820 papers) and Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (501 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Flow Turbulence and Combustion are Franck Nicoud, F. Ducros, Florian Menter, Epaminondas Mastorakos, Nilanjan Chakraborty, Niles A. Pierce, Michael B. Giles, Markus Klein, Ian P. Castro and Zheng-Tong Xie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion.

Countries where authors publish in Flow Turbulence and Combustion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Flow Turbulence and Combustion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flow Turbulence and Combustion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025