This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fish Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fish Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fish Pathology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fish Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fish Pathology.
About Fish Pathology
The 1.7k papers published in Fish Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 24.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Fish Pathology usually cover Immunology (1.1k papers), Aquatic Science (367 papers), Microbiology (196 papers), Endocrinology (148 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (191 papers) specifically the topics of Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (1.0k papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (307 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (257 papers), Myxozoan Parasites in Aquatic Species (198 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (186 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (181 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (157 papers) and Vibrio bacteria research studies (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fish Pathology are Hisatsugu Wakabayashi, Kazuo Ogawa, Syuzo EGUSA, Kiyokuni Muroga, Kazuhiro Nakajima, Kishio Hatai, Hiroshi Yokoyama, Toshihiro Nakai, Mamoru Yoshimizu and Takaji Iida.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.