Feminist Studies

1.2k papers and 25.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Feminist Studies in the last decades have received a total of 25.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Feminist Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (420 papers), Gender Studies (177 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (130 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (108 papers), Race, History, and American Society (69 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Feminist Studies are Donna Haraway, Sherry B. Ortner, Maxine Molyneux, Bonnie Thornton Dill, Rosalind Pollack Petchesky, Bina Agarwal, Joan Wallach Scott, Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, Maxine Baca Zinn and Sara Ruddick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Feminist Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Feminist Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Feminist Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Feminist Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Feminist Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Feminist Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminist Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025