Foot & Ankle Specialist

1.1k papers and 10.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (789 papers), Surgery (561 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (232 papers) specifically the topics of Foot and Ankle Surgery (664 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (447 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (366 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foot & Ankle Specialist are Gregory C. Berlet, Lowell Weil, Christopher F. Hyer, Selene G. Parekh, Tun Hing Lui, Dane K. Wukich, Thomas S. Roukis, Natalie C. Suder, Samuel B. Adams and Christopher E. Gross.

In The Last Decade

Foot & Ankle Specialist

1.0k papers receiving 9.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist.

Countries where authors publish in Foot & Ankle Specialist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foot & Ankle Specialist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foot & Ankle Specialist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foot & Ankle Specialist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026