Theoretical Chemistry Accounts

3.8k papers and 117.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts in the last decades have received a total of 117.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.0k papers), Materials Chemistry (1000 papers) and Organic Chemistry (977 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.6k papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (725 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (385 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts are Donald G. Truhlar, Yan Zhao, Kenneth G. Dyall, Florian Weigend, Matthias Krack, J. G. Snijders, Célia Fonseca Guerra, G. te Velde, Kirk A. Peterson and Karin Eichkorn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Chemistry Accounts more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025