Expert Review of Vaccines

2.3k papers and 66.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines in the last decades have received a total of 66.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines usually cover Epidemiology (1.1k papers), Infectious Diseases (763 papers) and Immunology (642 papers) specifically the topics of Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (400 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (380 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (342 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Review of Vaccines are Derek T. O’Hagan, Thomas P. Monath, Nathalie Garçon, Nikolai Petrovsky, Ève Dubé, Dennis M. Klinman, Bryce Chackerian, Noni E. MacDonald, Marcelle Van Mechelen and Satya Parida.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Review of Vaccines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Review of Vaccines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Review of Vaccines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Review of Vaccines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025