Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics

355 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 355 papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics usually cover Molecular Biology (89 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (57 papers) and Epidemiology (56 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (17 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (16 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics are Prasad Devarajan, Attila T. Lörincz, Stuart L. Hazell, Meena Upadhyaya, Michel Modo, Ondřej Topolčan, L Holubec, Martin R. Turner, Annemieke Geluk and Jimmy Espinoza.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025