Evolutionary Human Sciences

227 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 227 papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences usually cover Sociology and Political Science (104 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 papers) and Social Psychology (60 papers) specifically the topics of Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (68 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (56 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evolutionary Human Sciences are Sergey Gavrilets, Nichola Raihani, Redouan Bshary, Caroline Schuppli, Carel P. van Schaik, Daniel Major‐Smith, James H. Jones, Alex Mesoudi, Marı́a Fernanda Sánchez Goñi and Hugo Mercier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Evolutionary Human Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evolutionary Human Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evolutionary Human Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolutionary Human Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025