Equine Veterinary Education

3.2k papers and 18.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Equine Veterinary Education in the last decades have received a total of 18.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Equine Veterinary Education usually cover Equine (1.7k papers), Small Animals (1.0k papers) and Surgery (793 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (1.7k papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (308 papers) and Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (255 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Equine Veterinary Education are Sue Dyson, Tim Mair, Martin K. Nielsen, W. H. Tremaine, Nicola Robinson, P. M. DIXON, T. S. Mair, T. E. Walton, P. M. Dixon and James Schumacher.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Equine Veterinary Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Equine Veterinary Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Equine Veterinary Education.

Countries where authors publish in Equine Veterinary Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Equine Veterinary Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Equine Veterinary Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Equine Veterinary Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025