Countries where authors publish in Estudios Geológicos
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estudios Geológicos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estudios Geológicos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estudios Geológicos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Estudios Geológicos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estudios Geológicos.
About Estudios Geológicos
The 1.1k papers published in Estudios Geológicos in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Estudios Geológicos usually cover Archeology (461 papers), Paleontology (306 papers) and Geophysics (557 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (491 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (369 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (323 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (249 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (133 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (100 papers), Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America (98 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estudios Geológicos are Zbigniew Szyndlar, Jorge Morales, Carmen Sesé, Marı́a Teresa Alberdi, Martín Pickford, Carlos Sanz de Galdeano, Á. La Iglesia, C. Sanz de Galdeano, Antonio Ruiz Bustos and Eduardo Rodríguez Badiola.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.