Countries where authors publish in Estuaries and Coasts
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estuaries and Coasts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estuaries and Coasts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estuaries and Coasts more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Estuaries and Coasts
This network shows the impact of papers published in Estuaries and Coasts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estuaries and Coasts.
About Estuaries and Coasts
The 2.7k papers published in Estuaries and Coasts in the last decades have received a total of 63.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Estuaries and Coasts usually cover Oceanography (1.5k papers), Earth-Surface Processes (475 papers) and Ecology (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (958 papers), Marine and fisheries research (690 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (626 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (615 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (543 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (405 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (373 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (349 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estuaries and Coasts are Carlos M. Duarte, Hans W. Paerl, R. Eugene Turner, Donald R. Cahoon, Robert E. Hillman, Nathaniel B. Weston, Jacob Carstensen, David H. Schoellhamer, Alan D. Jassby and Robert J. Orth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.