Environmental Toxicology

3.4k papers and 72.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.4k papers published in Environmental Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 72.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Toxicology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.3k papers), Molecular Biology (1.0k papers) and Cancer Research (560 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (648 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (264 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Toxicology are Ian R. Falconer, Paul B. Tchounwou, Stephan Pflugmacher, Wellington K. Ayensu, Jing‐Gung Chung, Andrew R. Humpage, C. Blaise, Martin L. Saker, Min‐Yu Chen and Masanori Fujita.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025