Environmental Management

5.6k papers and 177.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.6k papers published in Environmental Management in the last decades have received a total of 177.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Management usually cover Global and Planetary Change (2.0k papers), Ecology (1.8k papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Land Use and Ecosystem Services (589 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (543 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (525 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Management are Stuart E. Bunn, Angela H. Arthington, Philip M. Fearnside, Paul J. Wood, Donald D. MacDonald, Fred D. Calder, Edward R. Long, Sherri L. Smith, James M. Omernik and Rattan Lal.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Management.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025