Emerging Markets Review

1.0k papers and 28.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Emerging Markets Review in the last decades have received a total of 28.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Emerging Markets Review usually cover Finance (651 papers), Accounting (507 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (479 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (379 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (267 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emerging Markets Review are Bernard S. Black, B. Burçin Yurtoğlu, George Emmanuel Iatridis, Stijn Claessens, Todd Mitton, Simon Neaime, Kevin Daly, Shawkat Hammoudeh, Alejandro Gaviría and Javier Estrada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Emerging Markets Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emerging Markets Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emerging Markets Review.

Countries where authors publish in Emerging Markets Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emerging Markets Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emerging Markets Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerging Markets Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025