Emerging Markets Review

1.0k papers and 31.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.0k papers published in Emerging Markets Review in the last decades have received a total of 31.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Emerging Markets Review usually cover Finance (667 papers), Accounting (522 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (499 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (387 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (266 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (249 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emerging Markets Review are Bernard S. Black, B. Burçin Yurtoğlu, George Emmanuel Iatridis, Stijn Claessens, Simon Neaime, Shawkat Hammoudeh, Kevin Daly, Javier Estrada, Alejandro Gaviría and Ender Demir.

In The Last Decade

Emerging Markets Review

959 papers receiving 28.8k citations

Countries where authors publish in Emerging Markets Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emerging Markets Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emerging Markets Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerging Markets Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Emerging Markets Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emerging Markets Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emerging Markets Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026