Electronic Materials Letters

1.5k papers and 16.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Electronic Materials Letters in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Electronic Materials Letters usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.0k papers), Materials Chemistry (815 papers) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (359 papers) specifically the topics of ZnO doping and properties (231 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (132 papers) and Plasmonics for Photovoltaic Devices (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electronic Materials Letters are Seon‐Jin Choi, Il‐Doo Kim, Ho Won Jang, Jae Hyun Kim, Jang‐Yeon Kwon, Do-Joong Lee, Jong‐Lam Lee, Byungwoo Park, Kihyon Hong and Tokio Nakada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Electronic Materials Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electronic Materials Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electronic Materials Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Electronic Materials Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electronic Materials Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electronic Materials Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electronic Materials Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025