Internal Medicine Journal

4.4k papers and 54.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Internal Medicine Journal in the last decades have received a total of 54.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Internal Medicine Journal usually cover Epidemiology (793 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (723 papers) and Surgery (660 papers) specifically the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (167 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (160 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internal Medicine Journal are D. Purdie, Ian Scott, David R. Williams, Changquan Huang, Huacong Deng, Gregory Cheng, J Vial, B. A. Hills, Eric F. Morand and Ian Kerridge.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Internal Medicine Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internal Medicine Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internal Medicine Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Internal Medicine Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internal Medicine Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internal Medicine Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internal Medicine Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025