Economic Theory

2.7k papers and 47.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Economic Theory in the last decades have received a total of 47.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Economic Theory usually cover Economics and Econometrics (2.2k papers), Management Science and Operations Research (1.1k papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (482 papers) specifically the topics of Economic theories and models (1.5k papers), Game Theory and Applications (601 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (534 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economic Theory are Stergios Skaperdas, Christopher A. Sims, Mark Bagnoli, Ted Bergstrom, Michael Woodford, Mordecai Kurz, Dan Kovenock, Nicholas C. Yannelis, Brian Roberson and Jason Dana.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economic Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economic Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economic Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Economic Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economic Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economic Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025