Countries where authors publish in Ethnobiology Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethnobiology Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethnobiology Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethnobiology Letters more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Ethnobiology Letters
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethnobiology Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethnobiology Letters.
About Ethnobiology Letters
The 302 papers published in Ethnobiology Letters in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Ethnobiology Letters usually cover Paleontology (45 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (27 papers), Anthropology (38 papers), Archeology (4 papers) and Ecology (65 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (37 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (25 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (24 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (23 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (17 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (17 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethnobiology Letters are Jonathan C. Driver, Steve Wolverton, Ryan Schram, E. N. Anderson, Raymond Pierotti, Jane Mt. Pleasant, Eugene N. Anderson, Monica N. Ramsey, Virginia L. Butler and Kate E. Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.