Ethnobiology Letters

285 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 285 papers published in Ethnobiology Letters in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethnobiology Letters usually cover Ecology (63 papers), Plant Science (50 papers) and Paleontology (42 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (34 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (25 papers) and Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethnobiology Letters are Jonathan C. Driver, Steve Wolverton, Ryan Schram, E. N. Anderson, Raymond Pierotti, Monica N. Ramsey, Eugene N. Anderson, Virginia L. Butler, Jane Mt. Pleasant and Kate E. Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethnobiology Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethnobiology Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethnobiology Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Ethnobiology Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethnobiology Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethnobiology Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethnobiology Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025