Countries where authors publish in Diatom Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diatom Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diatom Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diatom Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Diatom Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diatom Research.
About Diatom Research
The 1.1k papers published in Diatom Research in the last decades have received a total of 14.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Diatom Research usually cover Biomaterials (881 papers), Paleontology (230 papers), Oceanography (351 papers), Environmental Chemistry (193 papers) and Ecology (283 papers) specifically the topics of Diatoms and Algae Research (881 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (234 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (208 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (152 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (146 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (140 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (103 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diatom Research are Hannelore Håkansson, David M. Williams, F. E. Round, Karen K. Serieyssol, John Patrick Kociolek, Eileen J. Cox, Frank E. Round, Graham J. C. Underwood, Janne Soininen and David M. Paterson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.