Eileen J. Cox

3.2k total citations
104 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Eileen J. Cox is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eileen J. Cox has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Biomaterials, 31 papers in Molecular Biology and 29 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Eileen J. Cox's work include Diatoms and Algae Research (88 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (24 papers) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (18 papers). Eileen J. Cox is often cited by papers focused on Diatoms and Algae Research (88 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (24 papers) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (18 papers). Eileen J. Cox collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. Eileen J. Cox's co-authors include Ingrid Jüttner, Rosa Trobajo, David G. Mann, Marco Cantonati, Leopold Füreder, Reinhard Gerecke, Bart Van de Vijver, S. J. Ormerod, Victor A. Chepurnov and Ester Clavero and has published in prestigious journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, The Science of The Total Environment and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

Eileen J. Cox

102 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eileen J. Cox United Kingdom 27 1.8k 1.0k 677 625 519 104 2.5k
Carlos E. Wetzel Luxembourg 22 1.5k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 252 0.4× 295 0.5× 490 0.9× 192 2.0k
John Patrick Kociolek United States 29 3.1k 1.7× 1.6k 1.6× 802 1.2× 1.2k 1.9× 626 1.2× 349 3.8k
Horst Lange‐Bertalot Germany 29 2.8k 1.6× 1.8k 1.7× 924 1.4× 499 0.8× 961 1.9× 144 3.8k
Éva Ács Hungary 26 1.0k 0.6× 1.1k 1.1× 502 0.7× 248 0.4× 885 1.7× 125 2.1k
Aloisie Poulíčková Czechia 25 991 0.6× 1.3k 1.3× 573 0.8× 604 1.0× 897 1.7× 97 2.3k
Marina Potapova United States 19 1.5k 0.8× 1.4k 1.4× 358 0.5× 167 0.3× 780 1.5× 64 2.3k
Peter A. Siver United States 30 848 0.5× 1.4k 1.3× 674 1.0× 1.2k 1.9× 754 1.5× 149 2.7k
Mark B. Edlund United States 25 792 0.4× 870 0.9× 507 0.7× 216 0.3× 761 1.5× 108 2.0k
Kurt Krammer Germany 10 997 0.6× 725 0.7× 350 0.5× 132 0.2× 529 1.0× 15 1.6k
Irena Kaczmarska Canada 25 1.1k 0.6× 1.0k 1.0× 1.1k 1.6× 752 1.2× 497 1.0× 83 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Eileen J. Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen J. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen J. Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen J. Cox. The network helps show where Eileen J. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eileen J. Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eileen J. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eileen J. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eileen J. Cox. Eileen J. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cox, Eileen J. & Bart Van de Vijver. (2024). What constitutes a stigma? A review of isolated pores in raphid diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) and the value of precise terminology. Journal of Phycology. 60(6). 1498–1513. 2 indexed citations
4.
Poulíčková, Aloisie, et al.. (2017). Species complexes within epiphytic diatoms and their relevance for the bioindication of trophic status. The Science of The Total Environment. 599-600. 820–833. 17 indexed citations
5.
Jüttner, Ingrid, David M. Williams, Smriti Gurung, et al.. (2017). The genus Odontidium (Bacillariophyta) in the Himalaya—a preliminary account of some taxa and their distribution. Phytotaxa. 332(1). 5 indexed citations
6.
Poulíčková, Aloisie, Jiří Neustupa, Petr Hašler, Ondřej Tomanec, & Eileen J. Cox. (2016). A new species, Navicula lothargeitleri sp. nov., within the Navicula cryptocephala complex (Bacillariophyceae). Phytotaxa. 273(1). 4 indexed citations
7.
Vijver, Bart Van de & Eileen J. Cox. (2015). Fallacia emmaesp. nov., (Bacillariophyta) a New Soil-Inhabiting Diatom Species from the Sub-Antarctic Region. Cryptogamie Algologie. 36(3). 245–254. 4 indexed citations
8.
Gattuso, Jean‐Pierre, William Kirkwood, James Barry, et al.. (2014). Free-ocean CO 2 enrichment (FOCE) systems: present status and future developments. Biogeosciences. 11(15). 4057–4075. 46 indexed citations
9.
Bentley, Katie, Christopher D. Clack, & Eileen J. Cox. (2012). DIATOM COLONY FORMATION: A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY PREDICTS A SINGLE MECHANISM CAN PRODUCE BOTH LINKAGE AND SEPARATION VALVES DUE TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL SWITCH1. Journal of Phycology. 48(3). 716–728. 5 indexed citations
10.
Cox, Eileen J., Lisa Willis, & Katie Bentley. (2012). Integrated simulation with experimentation is a powerful tool for understanding diatom valve morphogenesis. Biosystems. 109(3). 450–459. 23 indexed citations
11.
Souffreau, Caroline, Heroen Verbruggen, Alexander P. Wolfe, et al.. (2011). A time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the diatom genus Pinnularia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 61(3). 866–879. 42 indexed citations
12.
Trobajo, Rosa, et al.. (2011). Effects of salinity on growth and on valve morphology of five estuarine diatoms. Phycological Research. 59(2). 83–90. 55 indexed citations
13.
Cox, Eileen J.. (2009). What’s in a name? – Diatom classification should reflect systematic relationships.. Acta Botanica Croatica. 68(2). 443–463. 13 indexed citations
14.
Cox, Eileen J. & David M. Williams. (2006). Systematics of naviculoid diatoms (Bacillariophyta): A preliminary analysis of protoplast and frustule characters for family and order level classification. Systematics and Biodiversity. 4(4). 385–399. 39 indexed citations
15.
Cox, Eileen J., et al.. (2002). Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from different benthic habitats within seven upland lakes in the Laguna San Rafael National Park, Chile. Boletín Museo Nacional de Historia Natural. 51. 11–41. 1 indexed citations
16.
Cox, Eileen J. & David J. Williams. (2000). Systematics of naviculoid diatoms: the interrelationships of some taxa with a stauros. European Journal of Phycology. 35(3). 273–282. 21 indexed citations
17.
Cox, Eileen J., Caroline Naylor, & Peter Calow. (1992). Frozen algae as food for Daphnia magna straus in toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 24(1). 58–62. 9 indexed citations
18.
Cox, Eileen J.. (1988). Variation Within the Genus Pinnularia Ehrenb.: Further Evidence for the Use of Live Material in Diatom Systematics?. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 437–447. 8 indexed citations
19.
Cox, Eileen J.. (1985). Auxosporulation by a naviculoid diatom and the taxonomic implications. British Phycological Journal. 20(2). 169–179. 20 indexed citations
20.
Cox, Eileen J.. (1981). MUCILAGE TUBE MORPHOLOGY OF THREE TUBE-DWELLING DIATOMS AND ITS DIAGNOSTIC VALUE1. Journal of Phycology. 17(1). 72–80. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026